Gospel Topic Essay Book of Mormon and DNA Studies
Exploring the origins of Native Americans within the context of the Book of Mormon raises complex questions about history, belief, and cultural narratives. For many Latter-day Saints, teachings about the Lamanites—portrayed as ancestors of Native Americans—have long been a cornerstone of understanding their connection to ancient scripture. But as modern genetic research has expanded, the conversation has shifted dramatically. Scientific evidence indicates that Native Americans primarily descend from ancient Asian populations who migrated across the Bering Strait, challenging the traditional LDS narrative that they descended from Middle Eastern groups.
In response to these discoveries, the LDS Church made significant updates. The 2006 edition of the Book of Mormon changed its introduction to state that Lamanites are “among the ancestors” of Native Americans, no longer claiming they are the principal ancestors. Additionally, the Church published a detailed Gospel Topics essay on DNA and the Book of Mormon, emphasizing that the text may describe a smaller group of ancient migrants among larger indigenous populations. This reframe suggests that scientific findings and religious belief might coexist, albeit with a revised understanding of history.
(Before the 2006 change, the introduction to the Book of Mormon stated:
“The Lamanites are the principal ancestors of the American Indians.”
This line reinforced the belief that Native Americans primarily descended from the Lamanites, a group described in the Book of Mormon
This change signaled an acknowledgment that the traditional narrative did not align with emerging scientific understandings.)
However, this scientific conversation opens up a deeper reflection on past LDS teachings. Many Native Americans, raised within the Church, were taught that they were literal descendants of the Lamanites. Programs like the Indian Placement Program reinforced this identity, aiming to “assimilate” Native children into white LDS families. Spencer W. Kimball’s comments during the 1960 General Conference[1] exemplify these racial undercurrents. He asserted that Native American children placed with LDS families were becoming “white and delightsome,” implying that their spiritual progress would manifest physically. This idea, rooted in early Mormon theology, linked righteousness with lighter skin—a concept echoed in older versions of the Book of Mormon.
The phrase “white and delightsome” itself was a source of controversy. Originally part of the Book of Mormon’s narrative about the Lamanites, it was later changed to “pure and delightsome” in the 1981 edition, reflecting a broader effort to distance the Church from racial interpretations. Yet, these historical teachings leave a lasting impact. For many, they evoke painful memories of racial discrimination and assimilation policies that sought to erase indigenous identities rather than celebrate them.
So, where does that leave us today? For those who have left the LDS Church, grappling with these issues reveals a pattern of selective disclosure and incomplete narratives. The Gospel Topics essays often present only partial information, leaving out critical details or framing historical issues in ways that minimize their impact. This selective transparency doesn’t invite genuine self-examination but instead seeks to control the narrative while maintaining institutional authority. The Church’s approach tends to protect its image rather than fully confront uncomfortable truths, often leaving marginalized voices unheard and historical injustices unacknowledged.
Moving forward means recognizing this pattern and seeking honesty outside institutional narratives. It involves listening to those whose stories were marginalized—not as a token gesture but as an essential step toward understanding the full picture. True progress lies in breaking away from sanitized versions of history and embracing the raw, complex truths that challenge the foundations of what many were taught to believe.
It became clear that the church prioritized preserving its authority over confronting uncomfortable truths, which led me to walk away. This decision wasn’t easy, but it was inevitable as I read the Gospel Topics essays. The teachings I had been raised with and had based my testimony on began to unravel before my eyes. The evidence provided, especially the DNA studies contradicting the Book of Mormon’s claims about Native American ancestry, forced me to reckon with the reality that the things I had long believed were not supported by facts. Rather than offering transparency, the church continued to spin its narrative, refusing to fully confront the implications of the scientific discoveries. This selective approach to truth ultimately shattered the foundation of faith I had built, leading me to leave the organization.
[1] The LDS.org sight only published old conference talks on their website up until 1971. The rest have been archived. In the second link below shows the direct link from lds .org to the archived ones. Although this is not the easiest source to find on your own, here it is.
https://archive.org/details/conferencereport1960sa/page/34/mode/2up?q=spencer+w+kimball

Leave a comment