Anger can be a necessary stage of deconstruction—but it was never meant to become home.

Leaving Mormonism felt a lot like grief to me.

Not just because I lost beliefs. I lost certainty. Community. Identity. Relationships. A version of myself I had spent over four decades building.

People often talk about deconstruction like it’s an awakening, and sometimes it is. But they don’t talk enough about how emotionally brutal it can be. At least for me, it came in waves. Shock. Denial. Curiosity. Sadness. Anger. Relief. Confusion. Freedom. Grief. Peace. Then sometimes right back to anger again.

It was never linear.

I remember feeling physically sick as I learned things I had never been taught. I remember crying over the realization that I had genuinely raised my children according to beliefs I no longer felt confident were true. I remember feeling embarrassed, betrayed, defensive, liberated, terrified, and deeply sad—sometimes all in the same day.

Anger was part of my healing.

I think anger is a completely understandable stage of deconstruction. When people feel manipulated, silenced, shamed, or misled, anger makes sense. Sometimes it is even necessary. Anger can help people reclaim themselves. It can create the courage to set boundaries and ask difficult questions.

But anger was never meant to become my permanent identity.

What I have observed, both personally and in others, is that some people get emotionally stuck there. The outrage becomes home. The disgust becomes identity. The pain becomes the lens through which every relationship, every memory, and every person is interpreted.

I understand why it happens. Especially online.

Social media rewards emotional certainty. Nuance doesn’t perform nearly as well as outrage does. Platforms continuously feed people content that validates their pain, reinforces their narrative, and confirms their worst interpretations of others. Before long, a person can find themselves emotionally immersed in a world where everyone becomes either safe or unsafe, enlightened or toxic, healed or abusive.

And real life is usually far more complicated than that.

I have watched someone else deconstruct very differently than I did. Their journey appears rooted heavily in anger, disgust, and emotional polarization. Relationships are framed in extremes. Entire chapters of life become rewritten as wholly bad or meaningless. People become villains instead of complicated humans.

I don’t say that with judgment. I say it with sadness.

Because I know firsthand that staying emotionally trapped in anger prolongs suffering. It keeps people tethered to the very pain they are trying to escape. It can stunt emotional growth without them even realizing it.

For me, healing only began when I allowed myself to move beyond needing every emotion to stay at maximum intensity.

That didn’t mean pretending everything was okay. It didn’t mean abandoning boundaries. It didn’t mean I suddenly approved of things I once felt deeply hurt by.

It meant allowing complexity back into my life.

I had to learn that:

• people can love you and still hurt you,
• systems can contain both beauty and harm,
• memories can be meaningful even if your beliefs changed,
• and leaving a religion does not require erasing every good thing that existed inside your former life.

Most importantly, I had to stop organizing my entire identity around what wounded me.

That was one of the hardest parts of healing.

Because eventually, after the anger quiets down, you are left with a deeper question:

Who am I beyond my pain?

I don’t think deconstruction ends when someone leaves a religion. I think it continues in how they rebuild themselves afterward.

And personally, I no longer want healing that depends on permanent emotional warfare.

I want peace.

*I am transitioning my writing to Substack. If you’d like to continue to follow my blog posts please subscribe. https://substack.com/@beyondthespaciousbuilding